There have been a few fat positive books released over the
last couple of years, which is awesome. I’ve read some, but not all (though I
want to), so this post is not targeted specifically at any particular book,
more generally at the way publishers and editors seem to appropriate the
movement.
I’m interested in the ways in which body acceptance
narratives are presented in a more mainstream setting. Generally speaking, fat
activists are introduced into mainstream discourses through history – I
experienced this myself when I was filmed to be on Cherry’s Body Dilemmas last
year. It’s necessary to justify our position as fat activists through the
reiteration of suffering that we’re experienced before getting to that point. I
am NOT interested in denying that we all face abuse on different levels, but
it’s interesting that our acceptance is always framed around it. How would I
have been portrayed if I’d always been happy, and never dieted, rather than having
gone through eating problems, fad diets and lots of abuse in various settings?
Would my acceptance have been presented as more or less valid? Would I have had
different reactions?
My interest in fat narratives has developed recently as more
books have been published with a “how to love your body” slant – self help, but
from a fat positive, more radical angle. I get that books need to offer
something unique, powerful and individual that makes a reader pick it from a
bookshelf (rather than the many alternatives), but I find these prescribed
narratives frustrating for a whole bunch of reasons, which I’m going to try and
explain here:
-
The process of “transforming” is
often used when talking about fat people – i.e. the before/after process of
dieting, the abjection of fat bodies etc. The presentation of us as inadequate
subjects/humans means that we have to undergo a process to become an acceptable
member of society – normally dieting, but I wonder how these narratives fit in
here too? Yes, they’re subversive in some ways, but they’re also still reliant
in this transformation in order to become acceptable.
-
I get frustrated with the
before/after presentation (i.e. before I hated myself, dressed in just black
and now I am really happy and wear bright, tight things) because it makes it
impossible to complicate the process – you’re either just happy or not happy at
all. The truth is that body acceptance is a process, and it doesn’t happen
overnight, and neither is it easy to completely shake off self hate. Everyone
has ups and downs, whether you’re super body confident or negative – the levels
just change. I cannot stress how hard it is to completely shut out fat
negativity and hate when it’s around you constantly – however, what’s important
is learning to decode these messages, how to compensate and deal with feeling
upset by them, and how to support your body in spaces which don’t do the same.
It’s okay to be upset and angry – but try and find ways to channel that upset
and anger at the source, rather than at you or those close to you.
-
Focusing on an end point (when you
completely love yourself and EVERYTHING IS HUNKY DORY) is kind of unproductive
– like I’ve already said, that end point is tough, and you might not ever get
there entirely. However, if you’ve made any progress at all, that’s fine,
because you’re still resisting at some level.
-
Body acceptance is different for
everyone!! I can tell you how I started to accept myself, and I can see
commonalities between my methods of acceptance and self-care and others’, but
our own methods and backgrounds are incredibly different. Fat acceptance is
incredibly diverse, and to me, is built on difference – some of us got into it
through academia, some clothes, some exercise, some community activism, some
sex positivity, and the list goes on! Also, I find these “how to” narratives
frustrating because they exclude people without certain resources, and always
seem to be written from a privileged position in society, and targeted at a
similar group.
It’s not that I don’t appreciate the contribution to publishing
that fat activists have made (I wouldn’t be here without having read some of
these books!), but I’d like to see more people queering and actively questioning
these transformation narratives and the structure behind them.